A recent series of articles from Canada’s The Globe and Mail newspaper featured Isadore Sharp’s new book, Four Seasons: The Story of a Business Philosophy. One thing that struck me when reading this was an expression that too many leaders don’t internalize nor demonstrate as often as they should: “We are only what we do, not what we say we are.” Of course, there are many variations of this mantra: “Walk the walk, don’t just talk the talk” or “Actions speak louder than words.” But when reading this piece, it hit me. These are not just words on a page or ancient words of wisdom that don’t have any real place in our modern day worlds. We all must read expressions like this and, as leaders, live them to their fullest intentions. Merely giving lip service to employees, partners, superiors, etc. does not make for an authentic leader.
Too many leaders, along with their communications staff, spend too much time thinking about how to say whatever it is they need to say. And, for sure, I commend those with the gift of gab for whom communicating clearly and with well-chosen words comes easy. I’ve surely written about the tremendously valuable ability to communicate clearly on my blog over the past year and think it is, without a doubt, one of the most critical skills anyone in business [and it really isn’t nor should be limited at all to people working in the business world] can possess. However, as important as such communications are, the benefits from them can be completely eroded when the actions don’t support the words. How often have people in our lives, be it in professional or personal circumstances, said one thing and done another? What are we to believe when such things occur?
One way that Isadore Sharp has integrated both communications and actions is in the creation of the “Glitch Report.” Every department at the hotel creates a diary of the previous day’s mistakes and uses this to both inform teams of issues and to ensure that, wherever possible, those mistakes are not replicated. Isadore Sharp explains this approach in this interview with National Geographic’s Intelligent Travel blog:
By keeping close tabs on what’s happening at the hotel every day, the management team has the ability to work closely with staff to continually teach, reinforce and empower them to make great customer service decisions.
This is not to say that there are times when our actions can’t match our words. We can have the greatest intentions to follow up our words with the appropriate actions, only to realize subsequently that we cannot do as we have said. In such times, express the changing circumstances aloud and let others know that you are fully aware that your prior words cannot be supported by current actions. In this way, you can demonstrate the realization that your initial words and actions won’t match, but you can modify the words, provide explanation, if necessary, and get your words and actions re-aligned to one another. People may not like the change, but they cannot disregard the effort to openly communicate and to keep the synchronicity of words and actions required for a trusted relationship intact.
This follows along my philosophy of telling it like it is. I know that this approach won’t please all of the people all of the time; but, it will allow all of the people to know where I stand all of the time. And given the choice of pleasing everyone all of the time [as if this could even happen] or being authentic and having all of the people know that what I say is so, I will always choose being regarded as authentic and honest to my words. And this recalls my belief about leaders in general in regard to the expression: “it is better to be respected and not liked than to be liked and not respected.”
Isadore Sharp understands that actions tell others who we are and what kind of person we are. He spent years evangelizing his laser focus on service and living up to the expression “We are only what we do, not what we say we are.” These words are easy to say but challenging to live up to. It required shifting mindsets, delegating responsibilities, giving up control when necessary, firing people who did not live up to the credo, despite them being competent in various other areas, and other such actions that demonstrated the seriousness with which his company was going to follow this path. Without a doubt, to those who have ever had the good fortune to stay at a Four Seasons hotel, the service ethic has been instilled throughout every level within the company. From the bellmen who greet arriving cars, to chamber maids, to wait staff and desk personnel. The Four Seasons chain of hotels demonstrates the possibilities of a corporate-wide focus on doing the right thing, not just saying the right words.
Today, the Four Seasons Hotel & Resorts “is considered among the finest luxury hotels worldwide, according to Travel + Leisure magazine and Zagat Survey, and operates 78 hotels in 32 countries including 22 AAA Five-Diamond properties.” Now if we can only get business leaders in all sorts of companies, industries and countries to follow the Four Seasons approach!
Nina Nets It Out:Words are just that…they’re words. If we say we are going to do one thing and we do another, of what value are the words we spoke? Clearly, we all want to be considered honest, authentic leaders. To achieve this, we must make certain to maintain synchronicity between what we say and what we do. If you must do something that differs from your words, at least offer an explanation and demonstrate your awareness of the discrepancy. The importance of this cannot be overstated for leaders who wish to be held in high regard and worthy of being considered a leader.
Nina,
Your post reminds me of why marketing should be taken very seriously. Far too many organizations allow their brand to outpace their people. An organization is only as good as the behaviors of those same people.
No written or spoken words can make up for our actions.
Hey Eric,
It sure is very true that people must stay ahead of the brand. In fact, in some companies, Southwest Airlines for example, it is the behaviors of the people that establish the brand and what it connotes in the marketplace. Never underestimate the power of marketing and, even more, the power of the behaviors of company personnel, to create marketplace meaning!
Thanks as always for your insights Eric.
Employees get transparency — and Corporate Speak — too. You get trust as a manager for what you say about twice. After that, if you don’t do what you say, people just watch what you do.
I had a manager once that told me the classic “don’t come in here with a problem unless you have a proposed solution.” So I did. At the end of the year, I got dinged on my performance review — because I always had an answer to a problem!
The next time I had a problem, I went in and, instead of offering up a possible solution, I said I was “really lost on this one and was really looking for some advice on how to handle this situation” because my manager had such experience in this area. And got a long answer that was the same one that I thought it was — but it wasn’t my idea, it was my manager’s idea. We got along just fine after that.
It’s not what my manager said to do, but what he did. And…what a waste of time effort and angst over just not saying what you think while being open to other’s opinions.
Good post, Nina. This needs constant reminding to managers and the people that work for them.
Hey there Scot,
It is ashame that there are SO many people, both in business and in life, that are unable to clearly and honestly communicate what they believe. As you did, I too have learned that actions speak louder than words by having superiors that didn’t walk the walk. Of course, this situation occurs at every level of the corporate ladder, so for sure, it is best to learn how to talk the talk and back it up with walking the walk as early in one’s career as possible!
Well, Nina, another excellent and thoughtful post.
Between the hypocrisy and mixed messages many insecure and sometimes incompetent managers spti out, no wonder so much of our work force produces only mediocre performances. My messages in the past were mixed due to my need to be LIKED as a manager; I couldn’t make a clear message due to my fear of hurting someone’s feelings. So only my own got hurt, and my profit margin.
Now, my messages are very clear. Employee actions that are injurious to the company’s profit and reputation are addressed for what they are: poor judgement and/or delayed response or inaction. Consequences are lose of job, no pay increases, or closure of the failing unit. And I repeat myself versus hope the responsible parties got it the first time (because they rarely do!). My messages are always delivered thoughtfully and with tact, even over email or a phone call (followed up by another email just in case the short term memory became impaired).
Hey Allen,
Thanks again for your readership and insightful commentary. I applaud leaders who understand that they are leaders, NOT friends to those who work within their organizations. I have written about this notion in a piece entitled “Democratic Dictatorship” [http://ninasimosko.com/blog/democratic-dictatorship-2/] and you are so right to point out that when leaders are vague or soft in their messages, the organization suffers.
Clear communication is something I am highly supportive and encouraging of. As I say, I’d rather hear a hurtful truth than a pleasant lie. Basically, as I discussed in the “Tell it Like it Is” piece [http://ninasimosko.com/blog/tell-it-like-it-is/], being able to speak honestly and clearly is critical to any leader’s success, or any person’s for that matter.
Keep up the good work and encourage employees to be clear, concise and honest in their communications both to you and your clients. It goes a long way to fostering goodwill.